Tag Archives: Kevin Millwood

Mets @ Orioles/Indians (6/11-6/17): Series at a glance

These next six games will be a telling sign for the Mets, given their season-long road struggles and the fact that the Orioles and Indians are terrible teams. So, since the Mets can really use these next two series to push them right into the thick of the pennant race, I’m going to combine both series into one preview.

By now you all know the story: the Mets are where they are right now because of their home record (now 24-10 after a 5-1 homestand). On the road, however, they are a putrid 8-18. But they really haven’t had a prime opportunity to make a statement on the road like they do now. I did some math — which means the stats I’m about to point out are probably wrong somewhere along the line — and up to this point, Mets road opponents (Atlanta/Cincinnati/Colorado/Florida/Milwaukee/Philadelphia/San Diego/St. Louis/Washington) have a combined record of 283-258 this season, good for a .523 winning percentage. So they have been playing some quality teams on the road, though it certainly does nto excuse them from playing so poorly.

But the O’s and Indians are a different story. The two teams combine for a 40-79 record, a lousy .336 winning percentage. On top of that, both teams are just as bad at home as the Mets are on the road. The Orioles are only 11-18 at home this season, while the Indians are 10-16. Offensively, of the 30 MLB teams, the Orioles rank 29th in runs scored, 27th in OBP, 26th in slugging, and 27th in OPS. The Indians rank 26h in runs, 25th in slugging, and 25th in OPS. This is good news for Mets pitching, especially given how well the starters have been throwing lately.

This weekend, the Mets will face Jeremy Guthrie, Brian Matusz, and Kevin Millwood. There has been a lot of talk about the Mets maybe making a trade for Millwood, but perhaps Guthrie is the one they should be asking the Orioles about. Despite a declining K/9 rate (4.75 this season compared to 5.53 career), all of Guthrie’s other peripherals this season are better than his career numbers. As for Millwood, this season’s 4.64 ERA and 4.95 FIP are bad enough, but then you compare them to his career 3.92 ERA and 3.88 FIP and it’s even worse. And his 7.28 K/9 rate, while good, is also decling from his career average of 8.27.

When the Mets head to Cleveland they will see two of Cleveland’s young arms in Justin Masterson and Mitch Talbot (with Jake Westbrook pitching the final game of the series). Masterson and Talbot are interesting when compared with each other. Looking at Masterson’s traditional stat line — 2-5, 4.74 ERA – it’s nothing special. But then you look closer and see a 8.03 K/9 rate, a 4.08 FIP and 3.88 xFIP, which tells you his defense has let him down a lot this season. Then you look at Talbot who, at 7-4, 3.59 ERA, is having a nice first full season. But with a 4.84 FIP and a 5.05 xFIP, it tells you his defense has actually been a lot of help for him. Oh, the quirkyness of baseball.

As for the Mets, they will go with RA Dickey, Hisanori Takahashi and Mike Pelfrey in Baltimore, then attack Cleveland with the lefty duo of Johan Santana and Jon Niese, before RA closes out the series. Interesting to see the knuckleballer opening up these next six games then ending it before next weekend’s showdown in the Bronx.


Investigating Luis Castillo Trade Rumors

Yesterday Twitter was all a-tweet with the rumor that Luis Castillo was going to the Chicago Cubs, Milton Bradley was going to the Rangers and Kevin Millwood was on his way to Citi Field. Phil Rogers of the Chicago Tribune was the first to report the rumor, which might make sense in the wake of news that Marlon Byrd is hitting free agency and the team could use an OF/DH type. Considering Bradley’s success in Texas, people felt the rumor had some legs. Today, the rumor was shot down by T.R. Sullivan of MLB.com who said that a Texas official said it wasn’t happening because Millwood was the Rangers’ #1 starter next year.

As unfortunate as that statement might be given the sorry state of affairs in the Texas rotation (Millwood should be a back-end option at this point in his career), a trade for Millwood would have been great for the Mets. Yes, his ERA was mostly luck-driven. Somehow he put up the best ERA in four years (3.67) despite also logging the worst strikeout rate of his career (5.57) and the worst home run rate in the last eight years (1.18). Consider that his fielding-independent pitching number (4.80) was also the worst of the last eight years. He benefited from his best BABIP in ten years (.279) and the best strand rate of his career (78.6%), and when those numbers go the other direction next year, his overall numbers will begin to look ugly once again.

So why would the Mets want him? For one, he’s a fairly reliable innings-eater, and Bill James projects him to pitch 175 innings next year (at a 4.30/1.40 pace), and that would have a place on a Mets’ staff that has struggled to fill the back end of their rotation for a couple years now (despite signing fringe arm after fringe arm). He gets people to reach (reach rate over 25% for the past four years), and he has a nice fastball/slider combination (both have been worth over 25 runs in his career). He has a decent groundball and flyball mix (43.1% and 34.7% respectively) that has stayed pretty steady over his career.

The reward is not great with Millwood, but the risk is also low – he’s been worth over $10 million dollars by FanGraphs’ calculations for the past five years. The odds are good that he’ll be worth over $10 million again, and he’s paid $12 million. With high-risk medium-reward players like Jonathon Niese and Oliver Perez and even John Maine in the rotation next year, having a known commodity like Millwood could help stabilize the back end of the rotation.

Would the Mets take Milton Bradley in a one for one? If it wasn’t for his 10-cent head, Omar Minaya might leap at the chance to acquire some offense for left field. There are some worrisome aspects to Bradley’s numbers, though. The bad batting average was not completely a result of luck (.311 BABIP in 2009, .330 career BABIP) and the precipitous drop in his slugging percentage (.242 ISO in 2008, .141 ISO in 2009) is probably the most troubling number. In his good year in Texas, Bradley had a 1.145 OPS at home (and a .651 slugging percentage) and a .872 OPS away from home (and only a .462 slugging percentage). A career ISO of .174 probably represents his upside in Citi Field, which would make him a .270/.380/.430 player in left field at best. Well, you know what – that’s better than the Mets got from left field in 2009 (.283/.346/.396). But is it so much better that the Mets need to sign up for Bradley’s tantrums?

An earlier rumor had catcher Chris Snyder from Arizona coming to the Mets for Castillo. Now we’re talking about a catcher with a career .233/.333/.398 line – and that trade got shot down by Arizona, too, as Joel Sherman reported in the NY Post.

Ouch. What’s the common thread here? The Mets are trying to trade Castillo and no one wants him. Big surprise for a second baseman that has been worth about $3 million less than the Mets have been paying him, has defense that has been clearly declining since he was in Florida and is now markedly below average, and now owns one skill – not swinging at any pitch whatsoever.

Perhaps that’s what led Jon Heyman to tweet this rather funny piece that we will leave you with:

things minaya can get for luis castillo: sunflower seeds, a donut, an assistant clubbie. what he cant get: kevin millwood.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 321 other followers